|
Undisclosed Church |
25th
May 2011 |
|
A return to a very active and favourite location to try to record evidence of such activity. |
||
The Investigation | ||
Background: As always we respect the wishes of the custodians and will not identify this location. We have had mixed results during our visits, some more impressive than others included recorded footfalls movement and items being moved, most occurrences have been inexplicable. Please view some of our previous reports and video footage from this “Undisclosed Church”. Apparatus: Digital Camera: Voice recorder: Other: Investigators: Ian, Kim, Paddy and Dave. Method: Investigation: Session two – Vigil in nave |
||
Results | ||
Session one – vigil in vestry. As Dave called asking if there was anything we could do to assist communication a noise similar to movement or dragging was heard from out in the church. Paddy, who was sitting on the steps to the vestry at the time, stood up, his attention drawn to area of the altar. As Dave continued calling along the same vain another noise was heard within the vestry. After the team moved into the main part of the church a further loud thump was heard from the altar area followed by a tap to the side. Later in the session Dave thought he saw a figure peer out from one of the central stone columns. Paddy assisted Dave and stood in the area he saw this and Dave established it would have been the head and shoulders of someone about four feet high. Dave also saw a wisp of light drift up the aisle towards us. Ian then thought he saw something move by the same column were Dave saw something earlier. Session two – Vigil in nave |
||
Conclusions | ||
Session one – vigil in vestry. The noises heard that drew the team out of the vestry were interesting but unfortunately were not recorded on our equipment, however, the teams reactions to them were. We do not doubt they occurred but are unable to analyse these further, therefore, can draw no conclusions on these. The figure Dave saw by the column and the light anomaly seen floating up the aisle were also not captured on our video. Dave was adamant what he saw, a figure around four feet high hiding behind the pillar, but no evidence of this exists for verification, needless to say we were the only four people in the building. The wisp of light may well have been a reflection in the lenses of his glasses as he glanced around, no one else saw this and that area was covered by Ian’s camcorder footage. The fact that Ian later thought he saw movement in the shadows around the same column may well have been either auto suggestive, as Dave had said he’s seen something, or simply the effect of tired eyes? Session two – Vigil in nave None of the results we thought we had were captured on our recordings so again, unfortunately, we cannot analyse these further, although some of the noises heard were heard by more than one person. The noise during the break and the one by the south door were of particular interest to the team at the time, and could not be explained. Neither could we explain why Paddy had the impression of others with us or the restless and nauseous feeling that came over him, again this is very odd and not like Paddy at all. The feeling of fatigue felt by the team were exactly that, fatigue. Session three – Vigil in chancel
As Ghost Connections conducts scientifically based investigations we
do not publish information of a clairvoyant nature, however, this information
is held on a separate database and may prove interesting when compared
to other peoples experiences. Should you wish to discuss this information
please email us at enquiries@ghostconnections.com |
||
Thanks | ||
Many thanks again to the owners as always for their support in allowing us access. | ||
©2004/2012 Ghost Connections UK |